Customer Reviews

Review #23 - Cable INTERCONNECT Dedalus Signal - Try a Ricable

dedalus signal
George Try a Ricable
From the Gazebo Audiophile forum

George F.

Source: Intel NUC i7 with Roon R.O.C.K. with linear power supply, SOtM sMS-200 with dedicated power supply

DAC: Dedicated

DAC brand and model: Denafrips Terminator

Amplification System: Integrated

Amplifier: Stax SRM-006tII

Acoustic Speakers: STAX SR-009

The following review of the INTERCONNECT Dedalus Signal cable is the result of the "Try a Ricable" initiative, which was created, in collaboration with listening groups or Hi-Fi forums, to collect testimonials from from the real listening experience of users, in their own reference Hi-Fi system.
The following Feedback was created on the basis of a predefined questionnaire to which the user returned their impressions, in a completely free.
We thank Giorgio for his time.

Construction and aesthetics. Did the cable feel solid and attractive?

The cable under test is impeccably made, with high-quality connectors and finished with an eye-catching yellow outer jacket. The cross-sectional area appears large, though it has excellent flexibility. The connectors are clamped, for optimal connection with any type of device.

Stax SRM-006tII
dedalus signal
How did you run the tests to find differences?

Listening sequences were conducted on the basis of a set of tracks, either alternating cables at the end of the identified set or alternating cables track by track. This was carried out over several days to minimize listening variables.

How did you carry out the tests? What tracks did you use to test the cable?

The cable supplied by Ricable is a new, unbroken-in cable, which is why it was played about forty hours before listening. The first sessions showed a warm, round sound, not too extended at the extremes but endowed with excellent midrange, natural and round, very pleasant with both male and female voices. No harshness, given the unobtrusive treble range, and no fouling, given the tendency to portray an unobtrusive bass. The soundstage appears wide, both frontally and laterally, giving excellent involvement.
The sound of the cable remained essentially the same until about one hundred hours of use. Past the hundred hours, the sound improved perceptibly, particularly in the low range, where the body of the sound appeared, finally, to be in line with what the reference cables showed. However, the sound remained quite closed, limited in extension, losing the finer details and what I like to call the "breath of music." The transverse width of the soundstage also remained relatively limited, more confined near the head. The test was carried out using very well recorded classical, jazz and rock music pieces, alternating the cables several times to test the repetitiveness of the sensations.

dedalus signal
Any differences from reference cables.
Have you encountered any?

Compared to reference cables there appears to be a certain lack of resolution in the finer details in the high range, a kind of opacity that does not allow certain textures of drum cymbals to be distinguished, lacking the magic that reference cables are able to restore. The low and mid-bass range also appear more backward, giving a very clean reproduction but not always with the necessary impact.
Past the hundred hours of listening, the high range failed to open up as I would have liked, maintaining a sonority distant from the detail proposed by the reference cables. The result, therefore, is an incomplete sonority, lacking the refinement in the high range that the reference cables allow, without ever generating aggressiveness and listening discomfort. A pity, given the excellent level achieved in the midrange.

What did you enjoy?

- The construction
- The musicality in the midrange
- Three-dimensionality
- Precise and captivating sound

What would you improve?

- Transparency in acute range
-
-
-

Leave a comment